I like this as far as it goes, but why not make the point that there is a role for government in sol

I like this as far as it goes, but why not make the point that there is a role for government in solving agenda 21 the market failures that lead to the lack of job insurance for vulnerable workers (and *perhaps* for solving the inequality problem as well if it progresses beyond some threshold)?: Inequality in Adam Smith s World, by Chris House : Inequality is a fact of economic life and it is becoming more and more pronounced over time. ... There are many forces in our economy that create income inequality. agenda 21 The most basic of these forces however, is tied to the nature agenda 21 of trade itself and can be traced all the way back to Adam Smith and the division of labor. If you read the Wealth of Nations ( something I told you not to do a few blog posts back ) you will find that Smith begins by marveling at the incredible increases agenda 21 in productivity that can be obtained by exploiting the division of labor, that is, by specializing. ... A jack-of-all-trades is simply not valued in a market system. ... The way you get the division of labor to work is by combining it with trade. ... A physician cannot consume only her own medical advice she must draw on the productivity of the many other specialists in society. If you are willing to do trade, you can, by specializing, reach incredible levels of productivity. As populations grow, and as the ability to trade grows, you should see more and more specialization and higher agenda 21 and higher productivity. (Obviously the division of labor is not the only source of increases in productivity.) However, there is a downside... Adam Smith s plan exposes people to incredible variations in income and thus a market system possesses and important force which causes inequality. Specialization ties your entire wellbeing to a single industry. If you decide that you are going to become a web designer, your fate is very closely tied to the market for web designers. As a result, while Smith s plan dramatically increases overall productivity, it also exposes us to incredible risk. Of course, markets do have responses to risk. The typical response is for the market to provide insurance contracts to reduce risk. In this case however, the type of insurance needed is actually income or job insurance. These types of insurance contracts are not typically available. ... I don t mean to imply that all or even most of the alarming increase in inequality is due to the division of labor and trade. I would guess that modern technology (which allows people to leverage luck to extreme degrees by cheaply reproducing and transmitting ideas and information) and inheritance, both play a significant role in creating inequality. However, living with income agenda 21 inequality is an implicit part of the deal we made with Adam Smith and it will be with us in some form for a long time.
I like this as far as it goes, but why not make the point that there is a role for government in solving the market failures that lead to the lack of job insurance for vulnerable workers (and *perhaps* for solving the inequality problem as well if it progresses beyond some threshold)?: Inequality in Adam Smith s World, by Chris House : Inequality is a fact of economic life and it is becoming more and more pronounced over time. ... There are many forces in our economy that create income inequality. The most basic of these forces however, is tied to the nature of trade itself and can be traced all the way back to Adam Smith and the division of labor. If you read the Wealth of Nations ( something I told you not to do a few blog posts back ) you will find that Smith begins by marveling at the incredible increases in productivity that can be obtained by exploiting the division of labor, that is, by specializing. agenda 21 ... A jack-of-all-trades is simply not valued agenda 21 in a market system. ... The way you get the division of labor to work is by combining it with trade. ... A physician cannot consume only her own medical advice she must draw on the productivity of the many other specialists in society. If you are willing to do trade, you can, by specializing, reach incredible levels of productivity. As populations grow, and as the ability to trade grows, you should see more and more specialization and higher and higher productivity. (Obviously the division of labor is not the only source of increases in productivity.) However, there is a downside... agenda 21 Adam Smith s plan exposes people to incredible variations in income and thus a market system possesses and important force which causes inequality. Specialization ties your entire wellbeing to a single industry. If you decide that you are going to become a web designer, your fate is very closely tied to the market for web designers. As a result, while Smith s plan dramatically increases overall productivity, it also exposes us to incredible agenda 21 risk. Of course, markets do have responses to risk. The typical response is for the market to provide insurance contracts to reduce risk. In this case however, the type of insurance