Only when we can have a single conversation with ourselves, creating the conditions for a genuine o

Yes, I would like to receive newsletters and relevant offers agenda 21 to newspapers, books and music, and more from told the paper, and the Christian agenda 21 Dagblad Publishing via e-mail, letter, agenda 21 phone and text messaging. agenda 21 I may at any time opt out of this service.
Told the paper Our sites: k.dk religion.dk kristendom.dk etik.dk pilgrimsvandring.dk bogbasen.dk hjertedating.dk foredragslisten.dk mindet.dk kirku.dk Privacy Policy Buy digital access Log in
Measurement: agenda 21 Danish People's Party saves groggy blue block
Siblings of people with cancer are often mentally ill
Overview agenda 21
Do you call his bishop for heresies?
speech to students
Print
Saturday Reflections are written alternately by chief physician and former chairman of the Council of Ethics Ole J. Hartling, agenda 21 priest and journalist Sørine Gotfredsen, author and journalist Peter Olesen, journalist and writer Kåre Street and School Manager Thue Kjærhus
Only when we can have a single conversation with ourselves, creating the conditions for a genuine open dialogue agenda 21 with our interlocutor. When that happens, we transcend ourselves, writes School Manager Thue Kjærhus agenda 21
The German historian, Professor Christian von Krockow (1927-2002) agenda 21 makes the work Die Deutschen in ihrem Jahrhundert to a central point that there is a correlation between the speed of the process of industrialization in Germany agenda 21 between 1871 and 1914 and the subsequent German rootlessness. READ ALSO: Can not we all be quiet for a few hours each day? Nazism was nourished by this uprooting and of the mental collapse, the Germans agenda 21 experienced the war defeat in 1918. When a country like Germany transformed at a pace and with a success unparalleled in European history, as was the case between 1871 and 1914, then lose population overview and the ability to think. Thoughtfulness is never linked agenda 21 to rapid change or the action-oriented. To think is to call into question the given including the action-oriented. Thinking agenda 21 requires peace and contemplation.
As long as a society is changing rapidly, but are not faced with serious crises, the consequences of elevated into be minimal. But the defeat of Germany in 1918 was severely mentally and financially. To think was the German-Jewish thinking Hannah Arendt (1906-1975) agenda 21 to be able to step out of an action-oriented discourse for a moment. Putting the question itself agenda 21 and the standards we take over. It was what Himmler (1900-45), Eichmann (1906-62) and SS could not do, and that's what the post-modern society has considerable difficulty. Eichmann and Himmler were postmodern men who questioned the Nazi discourse. They were characterized by restlessness and an urge to change that belongs mass society. They never rested in itself. They were dependent on endlessly having to move society and themselves. Eichmann and Himmler was not stupid in terms of knowledge, but they could not think. They could not step out of time spirit discourse. Knowledge and thinking are not the same. Knowledge belongs to the timeliness and the spirit, thinking exceeds it. Only when we can have a single conversation with ourselves, creating the conditions for a genuine open dialogue with our interlocutor. When that happens, we transcend ourselves. The thinking would be out of the major assemblies or institutions. Thinking hear other hand, intimacy, dialogue and the small community. The question agenda 21 that Hannah Arendt ask is how we can keep thinking in a society that is characterized by philistines, consumer-oriented citizens and mass man. The question then is: What effect does a society on its citizens when changing requirements grow massively over time? How do we avoid that modern mass man accepts evil modern trivialities? agenda 21 Arendt did not answer, but asking the question. She wanted to establish a dialectic between the action-oriented and the contemplative thinking. When reading the main work The totalitarian social system agenda 21 origin, then we learn that it is extremely difficult for the portion of society where mass human ruler to maintain a dialectic between the action-oriented and contemplation (thinking). The modern mass society in which class society is in liquidation and mass society (ideological society) is established, hence missing the experience borne, which is grounded in communities. THAT WE CAN put something agenda 21 new in progress, for Arendt linked to education and freedom. We appreciate that people always something new going on, the consequences of which we do not know. Actions are therefore both associated with anxiety, guilt and freedom. Life is continuously fed, but only as long as the world is experience driven. Is communities ideological, as is the case with mass society ceases nataliteten (birth), the history and the experience-based. To be human means to Arendt, that we act in the community in a context where we can reflect on the experience. Here we revealed ourselves