Sochi, Brazil, and our changing world | Human Capital. Sports and Investments
In the past it was clear dictatorial rulers but democratic el governments, should el and should host the Olympic Games or the World Cup. These times are changing now, and it's a part of a larger global el forces still feel it some day.
Putin really like to stay in Sochi, and fought very hard hosting the Winter Games in February this year. Billions of dollars in payments probably el gone Putin's confidants establish the sites that will host the games, el as well as the surrounding infrastructure. It's evident from what Putin wanted the games, plus up considerations can also add the prestige that comes with hosting the Olympic Games. But in recent years when the referendum raised the question of whether to compete for the right to host the Olympic Games, the answer obtained is often negative. Russian social networks (as opposed to Brazil, Russia dangerous to protest in the streets), there is tremendous unrest environment Sochi residents complaining of corruption and their goddamn life. Now add the attacks, including great fun to be a Russian in this area.
Brazil saw the enormous protest in the summer, and it's a country that loves football, el and a chance to win the World Cup. The protest did not calm down, you may if Brazil did win the cup, the president will not hurt as a result of hosting the World Cup, but in principle, el contrary el to expectations, the Olympics el did not contribute in any way to its popularity in Brazil, one can say the exact opposite. Also we knew the effect of exchanges are places el where hosts the Olympic Games or World Cup soccer tournament, not really happening. In short, it may not be long before the only dictatorships fight for the right to host games such politicians really should be chosen not run bet on the future.
This failure relates to equality in the world. On the one hand, especially the Western el world, inequality widens between the top percentile and the middle class almost every point which touch on the map. However, when we look at the global inequality glasses, is the first time in more than fifty years, the last decade excel at reducing disparities between residents of different states. That is, if we look at the inequality perspective of percentiles spread over the whole world, is that the global middle class actually progressed (50-70 percentiles account that the middle class in the developed world including Israel), and there is a trend of approaching and greater distribution of wealth in the world.
Many argue that globalization and post production el weak places in the world, contributes to a greater distribution of wealth observe the world, but also increase inequality among developed countries, since developing world who have jobs are just jobs are disposed of in the developed world. el The argument is that today in the world, or you are a cashier, frying burgers earning minimum wage or a high income and middle went to other places in the world.
I do not agree with this argument. el The world's wealth is not a zero sum game. As economic development in Asia and South America, no small amount of wealth concentrated in the western world, the matter is different. Convergent Wealth pockets of the top percentile when it loses its dependence on the middle class in our country, and enrichment can get without paying well for many workers in your country. Whereas before Henry Ford for example, depended on employees want Detroit to get rich, the day Jeff Bezos does not depend on workers approved in the United States, Jamie Dimon did not have to worry about employees from the middle class, and the owner of Wal-Mart and get a subsidy Mkdolnlds including the United States, Sotziliim transferring payments to employees who receive salaries Wal-Mart and McDonald's, it's more or less the height of cynicism.
But it seems to me that the unrest is felt in Brazil, and is also present in Russia, is that unrest will change the trend in the coming years. In the coming year in Germany and in 13 states el in the United States, raise the minimum wage. It is a political demand, a survey conducted in the United States turns out that 78% of state support el raising the minimum wage (although there is no support within the Republican Party takes up most seats in Congress). If time could silence the feeling of deprivation by pressuring major media organizations, and contributions to politicians right now social networks transmit their feelings to everyone.
No longer possible to continue to work for everyone all the time. Will be enough for those who understand the game, and will properly understanding who could not have been silenced them with money. So I still believe, in 2008 began the process of reducing disparities among residents of developed countries. el Although there are strong indications that much, the pendulum has reached its extreme and difficult economic el situation, el will the information out of necessity, all those were truly over the years.
The world is changing fundamental change, social networking Indeed, since all the way information travels, and with power can no longer control information in the past. We saw this in the Arab world, we see this in the context of web games, and it seems that the change to come. Raising the minimum wage is the easy bit.
Perceptual process must have realized significant momentum in the past two years. Material, cheap money and trends in technology and globalization make the wealthy wealthier and larger gaps - the strongest companies and their shareholders that most - most of the top echelon directly or indirectly make more efficient use cheap credit to a buyback and to pay dividends el and should produce jobs to grow.
Omri - as understand the system, will find a way to change its results. Cheapest agree with you that money is not going anywhere, but - has the tax policy, there is the minimum wages, there is the way the distinction between senior and regular (ie all receive the same equity incentives), and then suddenly return to narrow gaps
You assume that changes progressives are the only option, but if there's one thing the twentieth century el has demonstrated is that
In the past it was clear dictatorial rulers but democratic el governments, should el and should host the Olympic Games or the World Cup. These times are changing now, and it's a part of a larger global el forces still feel it some day.
Putin really like to stay in Sochi, and fought very hard hosting the Winter Games in February this year. Billions of dollars in payments probably el gone Putin's confidants establish the sites that will host the games, el as well as the surrounding infrastructure. It's evident from what Putin wanted the games, plus up considerations can also add the prestige that comes with hosting the Olympic Games. But in recent years when the referendum raised the question of whether to compete for the right to host the Olympic Games, the answer obtained is often negative. Russian social networks (as opposed to Brazil, Russia dangerous to protest in the streets), there is tremendous unrest environment Sochi residents complaining of corruption and their goddamn life. Now add the attacks, including great fun to be a Russian in this area.
Brazil saw the enormous protest in the summer, and it's a country that loves football, el and a chance to win the World Cup. The protest did not calm down, you may if Brazil did win the cup, the president will not hurt as a result of hosting the World Cup, but in principle, el contrary el to expectations, the Olympics el did not contribute in any way to its popularity in Brazil, one can say the exact opposite. Also we knew the effect of exchanges are places el where hosts the Olympic Games or World Cup soccer tournament, not really happening. In short, it may not be long before the only dictatorships fight for the right to host games such politicians really should be chosen not run bet on the future.
This failure relates to equality in the world. On the one hand, especially the Western el world, inequality widens between the top percentile and the middle class almost every point which touch on the map. However, when we look at the global inequality glasses, is the first time in more than fifty years, the last decade excel at reducing disparities between residents of different states. That is, if we look at the inequality perspective of percentiles spread over the whole world, is that the global middle class actually progressed (50-70 percentiles account that the middle class in the developed world including Israel), and there is a trend of approaching and greater distribution of wealth in the world.
Many argue that globalization and post production el weak places in the world, contributes to a greater distribution of wealth observe the world, but also increase inequality among developed countries, since developing world who have jobs are just jobs are disposed of in the developed world. el The argument is that today in the world, or you are a cashier, frying burgers earning minimum wage or a high income and middle went to other places in the world.
I do not agree with this argument. el The world's wealth is not a zero sum game. As economic development in Asia and South America, no small amount of wealth concentrated in the western world, the matter is different. Convergent Wealth pockets of the top percentile when it loses its dependence on the middle class in our country, and enrichment can get without paying well for many workers in your country. Whereas before Henry Ford for example, depended on employees want Detroit to get rich, the day Jeff Bezos does not depend on workers approved in the United States, Jamie Dimon did not have to worry about employees from the middle class, and the owner of Wal-Mart and get a subsidy Mkdolnlds including the United States, Sotziliim transferring payments to employees who receive salaries Wal-Mart and McDonald's, it's more or less the height of cynicism.
But it seems to me that the unrest is felt in Brazil, and is also present in Russia, is that unrest will change the trend in the coming years. In the coming year in Germany and in 13 states el in the United States, raise the minimum wage. It is a political demand, a survey conducted in the United States turns out that 78% of state support el raising the minimum wage (although there is no support within the Republican Party takes up most seats in Congress). If time could silence the feeling of deprivation by pressuring major media organizations, and contributions to politicians right now social networks transmit their feelings to everyone.
No longer possible to continue to work for everyone all the time. Will be enough for those who understand the game, and will properly understanding who could not have been silenced them with money. So I still believe, in 2008 began the process of reducing disparities among residents of developed countries. el Although there are strong indications that much, the pendulum has reached its extreme and difficult economic el situation, el will the information out of necessity, all those were truly over the years.
The world is changing fundamental change, social networking Indeed, since all the way information travels, and with power can no longer control information in the past. We saw this in the Arab world, we see this in the context of web games, and it seems that the change to come. Raising the minimum wage is the easy bit.
Perceptual process must have realized significant momentum in the past two years. Material, cheap money and trends in technology and globalization make the wealthy wealthier and larger gaps - the strongest companies and their shareholders that most - most of the top echelon directly or indirectly make more efficient use cheap credit to a buyback and to pay dividends el and should produce jobs to grow.
Omri - as understand the system, will find a way to change its results. Cheapest agree with you that money is not going anywhere, but - has the tax policy, there is the minimum wages, there is the way the distinction between senior and regular (ie all receive the same equity incentives), and then suddenly return to narrow gaps
You assume that changes progressives are the only option, but if there's one thing the twentieth century el has demonstrated is that
No comments:
Post a Comment